I spent all the afternoon checking my configuration and starting racoon manually. I've just seen your message and tried the script at init.d again and it printed the "." and the newline.Īnd indeed there was an IP that wasn't answering properly but now it's fixed. So the problem was probably, as you said, that my wrong configuration prevented racoon to start. Starting IKE (ISAKMP/Oakley) server: racoon/ usr/sbin/ racoon already tangamandapio- laptop: ~$ If I remove it I tangamandapio- laptop: ~$ sudo /etc/init.d/racoon start The script seems to be assuming that the error, the "." and the newline will be printed by start-stop-daemon, but the -quiet option prevents it. Now, the quiet option is probably there for some reason, and I'm not sure if it's a bug. Testing it further, if I do "/etc/init.d/racoon start" twice, the first time the daemon will start and will print the new line. The second time it will fail because it's already running, but no error message is given and no newline will be printed. If I remove it I sudo /etc/init.d/racoon start The problem seems to be in the -quiet option passed to start-stop-daemon. Starting IKE (ISAKMP/Oakley) server: racoon/usr/sbin/racoon already script seems to be assuming that the error, the "." and the newline will be printed by start-stop-daemon, but the -quiet option prevents it. Now, the quiet option is probably there for some reason, and I'm not sure if it's a bug.I'm trying to get VPN access up and running. To support various environments that use IPsec, we will develop various. The company has a SonicWall firewall/concentrator and I'm working on a Mac. The implementation is called Racoon2, a successor of Racoon, which was developed. Besides that it can compress packets, reducing traffic. I'm not sure of the SonicWall's hardware or software level. Theory IPsecis a standard for securing IP communication through authentication, and encryption. My MacBook Pro is OS X 10.8, 圆4, fully patched. This is utter garbage, as a Wireshark trace shows the Protected Mode negotiation, and then the fallback to Quick Mode: The connection attempt subsequently fails: The Mac Networking applet claims the remote server is not responding. I have two questions: (1) does Mac OS X VPN work in real life? (2) Are there any trustworthy (non-Apple) tools to test and diagnose the connection problem (Wireshark is a cannon and I have to interpret the results)?Īnd a third question (off topic): what is so broken in Cupertino such that so much broken software gets past their QA department? I pay good money for the software to run their hardware, and this is an absolute joke.ĮDIT (, 6:00 PM): The network guy sent me "VPN Configuration Guide" (Equinox document SonicOS_Standard-6-EN). IPSECURITAS COULD NOT START RACOON SOFTWARE It seems an IPSec VPN now requires a Firewall Unique Identifier. Wed Nov 14 17:23:16 2012 : IPSec connection failed Wed Nov 14 17:23:16 2012 : IPSec phase 1 client started Wed Nov 14 17:23:16 2012 : IPSec connection started Wed Nov 14 16:26:12 2012 : IPSec connection failed Wed Nov 14 16:25:41 2012 : IPSec phase 1 server replied Wed Nov 14 16:25:41 2012 : IPSec phase 1 client started I cannot find a reference to Firewall Unique Identifier.ĮDIT (, 11:00 PM): From the Mac OS X logs (so much for the garbage message box from this crummy operating system): Wed Nov 14 16:25:41 2012 : IPSec connection started Just to be sure, I revisited RFC 2409, where Main Mode, Aggressive Mode, and Quick Mode are discussed. I am trying to connect to a broken (non-standard) firewall, with a broken Mac OS X client. This thread comes up on a lot of Google searches for Mac OS X compatibility with SonicWall VPNs, so even though the thread is old, I just wanted to post that YES, Mac OS X's native VPN client works fine with SonicWall's L2TP VPN. default 00:50:20.417829 +0100 racoon IPSec Phase 1 started (Initiated by me). IPSECURITAS COULD NOT START RACOON FOR MAC OS X Proper configuration is necessary on the UTM-side, but the UTM admin should have confirmed Mac OS X compatibility before provisioning a VPN account to you (IMHO).įor troubleshooting, I recommend two things: Third-party VPN clients are nice and full-featured, but certainly not required.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |